<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Quisitivity - Latest Comments</title><link>http://quisitivity.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://quisitivity.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:17:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Lessons Learned from Pawn Stars</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/06/lessons-learned-from-pawn-stars/#comment-55484245</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great points in this post.  So many of our students do have passions about learning, but they just don't fit into the "system of school."  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christine</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 10:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lessons Learned from Pawn Stars</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/06/lessons-learned-from-pawn-stars/#comment-55411493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What strikes me about the show is how much history these guys really know.  I wonder if they knew that they liked history so much in school?  My guess is that they didn't like the "school version" of history.  It is interesting how passions in learning play out in life.  You are right, we can't try to fit students into the spaces we think they should fit in, it is up to us to help them find creative ways to play out their passions. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ktenkely</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:39:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Change a Child&amp;#8217;s Life</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/05/how-to-change-a-childs-life/#comment-53412577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very well put!  What if this was the metric by which a teacher were measured.  I remember the teachers who did this for me and an argument can be made for the impact it has had on who I am today.  What a message.... Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diana Laboy-Rush</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Change a Child&amp;#8217;s Life</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/05/how-to-change-a-childs-life/#comment-52390936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a lovely idea! This is why people say that it's the teacher that makes a difference. Relationships are so important. If a child feels safe and valued they are bound to be more open to learning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pamthompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 07:58:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Change a Child&amp;#8217;s Life</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/05/how-to-change-a-childs-life/#comment-51926985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post! I love the paragraph where you talk about "lighting a fire" being a rule. I would want to put my child in a school where "every child in our care left school every day feeling valued, encouraged, smart, and capable."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 10:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Student Blogging</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-student-blogging/#comment-50650853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"...blogging is more about reading than it is about writing. Students can and should take time to read a great deal about what they want to learn before they write about it. The teacher can and should provide starting points for this reading, but the power of blog reading comes from students exploring on their own, following links within blog posts, reading other articles by the same authors, and looking for new connections and relationships."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll also add to this idea: that getting students to read one another's blog posts- and offering constructive criticism as to their content, use of writing conventions like capitalization, usage, and mechanics further supports that blogging is more about reading than merely writing. Great post. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buzz Garwood</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:46:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Blog at TransLeadership</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/05/guest-blog-at-transleadership/#comment-48965268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, I have the same "annoying habit". I think it is probably a common one, those of us who are learners, can't help but share. &lt;br&gt;I am looking forward to meeting you and learning from you at ISTE (oh yeah, sharing too) :)  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ktenkely</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failure Is Not An Option&amp;#8230;But It Should Be!</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2009/08/failure-is-not-an-option-but-it-should-be/#comment-46747423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hello sir/madam,&lt;br&gt;i'm from Ethiopia.the things that you heve disscused above are fantastic and good.And i want to ask you one basic question that is contradicted in different texts.The question is as follow:&lt;br&gt;Is it error more sereous make hinderance in communication than mistakes?or Mistake  is more difficult than errors?please, discuss on these questions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">abtajofromjimma</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:21:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Longer a Teacher</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/no-longer-a-teacher/#comment-45084524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I very much appreciate your addition of designer in the redefinition of teacher- today heard someone speak to idea that teachers need learning studios where they work collaboratively to co-create learning opportunities. Is the next logical step is to redefine students as learners and designers? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Longer a Teacher</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/no-longer-a-teacher/#comment-43423107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am reading this blog as a part of an online course I am taking where they have used your blog to help us learn about Wiki's in the classroom. I totally agree that teachers must be learners first and yes designers also. I have a Master's and have taught for 20 years but I am still taking courses (mostly online now) as that is the most efficient use of my time. I value my graduate programs that I have taken and plan on continuing in that area. Thank you for zeroing in on how we need to change to facilitate our students' learning in the future. I am learning how to navigate Wiki's to use with my students in order to allow collaboration and research that they will be comfortable using as they are using technology daily.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lindatrader</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Interactive Fiction</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-interactive-fiction/#comment-42461771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love this idea like the old "Choose Your Own Adventure" books.  Stories could be written incorporating a variety of curriculum subjects.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This activity would be wonderful to get elementary students applying comprehension skills such as cause and effect, sequencing, and predicting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emily Starr</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failure Is Not An Option&amp;#8230;But It Should Be!</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2009/08/failure-is-not-an-option-but-it-should-be/#comment-42427950</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I enjoy your posts and this is definitely one of my favorites. I will link to it in one my future posts. &lt;br&gt;I believe, as I am sure you do, in being born to learn from our failures. nobody, even the gifted, is immune from experiencing failure in his life. It is part and parcel of the process. As babies we learn to stand up and take a step or two, but the option of falling again is THERE!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">R. Med</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:37:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Student Blogging</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-student-blogging/#comment-38913825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post. It planted a seed in my mind for a teacher I work with. I think blogging may be a useful tool for her and her students.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Boito</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Student Blogging</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-student-blogging/#comment-38862767</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had wonderful results using blogs with the gifted education students I taught last year. You have done a great job describing why blogging should be used with students, all students not just gifted ones. Thanks for sharing!! I will be bookmarking this blog to use when I talk to teachers about blogging! Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melissa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Student Blogging</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-student-blogging/#comment-38593630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you summed it all up perfectly, it all comes back to providing our students with authentic learning experiences.  Technology allows our students that possibility, connecting with other students with similar interests from around the world and also with experts on any and every topic.  My GT kids really enjoy blogging and do it more often than most of their classmates.  I think it gives them an outlet and a place to be understood.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ktenkely</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Student Blogging</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-student-blogging/#comment-38564983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great ideas for all, not just gifted students.  Many times teachers need enrichment activities for students as well.  Thanks for sharing, and I'll share this information with my network of teachers as well!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Interactive Fiction</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-interactive-fiction/#comment-38533056</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Kelly, one of the things I like about it is how describing an object in the code makes it act like a literal, physical thing. The author has to think through how the player/reader is likely to interact with the object, so descriptions have to be rich and actions have to be planned.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's great for learning characterization, too, since you have to plan out multiple conversation paths depending on what the player/reader decides to talk about. The author has to think deeply about the character and understand far more than ever gets seen in the final product.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Descriptions of places must be clear and evocative, since they must not only build a picture in the reader's mind, but they must actually work as described. Writers can learn a lot about the craft of writing by working on small portions of IF code.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerald Aungst</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:48:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Interactive Fiction</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-interactive-fiction/#comment-38533055</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IF is a great way to get students thinking about problem/solution in writing and thinking critically.  Writing this way would have students going through the entire writing process. I love the ideas!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelly Tenkely</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Tools: Interactive Fiction</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/03/tech-tools-interactive-fiction/#comment-38533054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was interesting. I'd forgotten about those things. Nothing ever completely goes away, does it? They just get repurposed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Boito</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Banish the PowerPoint Curriculum</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/banish-the-powerpoint-curriculum/#comment-38533051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gerald, I love the way you applied this idea to curriculum design.  It is time that we got some curriculum zen flowing through the school system.  Every teacher should understand the design process, it should be an extension of what we do every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelly Tenkely</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Banish the PowerPoint Curriculum</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/banish-the-powerpoint-curriculum/#comment-38533050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel sorry for teachers who are inundated with stuff the must teach. They don't even have 30 seconds to think about whether (let alone how) that stuff could be used to further their objectives.  I see third grade teachers being required to teach vocabulary that I decided my first-year college students don't need to know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nobody wants to use the word "objectives" but I believe that's what is needed as a starting point. See  &lt;a href="http://www.you-can-teach-writing.com/writing-objectives.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.you-can-teach-writing.com/writing-objectives.html"&gt;http://www.you-can-teach-wr...&lt;/a&gt;  Having spent a lot of time writing instructional materials for industry, rather a nut on the topic of objectives. I don't think education can be run like a business, but using some business-like principles might not come amiss.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linda Aragoni</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:16:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Banish the PowerPoint Curriculum</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/banish-the-powerpoint-curriculum/#comment-38533049</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Art I also have experience with PA standards. I spent some time as the science coordinator in my previous district, and had to find a way to fit all of the 4th grade standards into the K-4 curriculum. It doesn't work. We made many compromises to avoid a curriculum that was impossibly oppressive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do think that a problem-based curriculum (rather than a content-based one) could be part of the answer. If we create deep, interesting problems for students to solve, they will touch on many more ideas included in the standards than we can address otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerald Aungst</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Banish the PowerPoint Curriculum</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/banish-the-powerpoint-curriculum/#comment-38533048</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've read Reynold's book and blog, as well, and I totally agree with your connection to curriculum.  Your post struck me because as an American History teacher, the History Standards from the state I'm from (PA)  is packed with so much information it would take 12 years of just teaching American History to properly teach it.  Now with a push for ever more aligned curriculum and teaching the art of teaching is being supplanted with the "science" of teaching (whether it's a canned program or not).  Data driven and standards aligned curriculum are being foisted on all of us to be sure students can regurgitate facts that will be forgotten after they take the test. That's accountability.  Excellent post, worthy of being passed around.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Art Titzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Longer a Teacher</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/no-longer-a-teacher/#comment-38533047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Todd, I understand what you're trying to say, but I strongly disagree. While the personal learning is important and cutting edge, there is still tremendous value in time-tested, thoroughly explored understanding that has made its way through the publication process. I would hardly call it redundant. That's not to say that every graduate program is equally relevant, of course.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's also the structure and rigor that's built into those programs. In your life, you are free to choose to learn (or not learn) whatever you like. In a graduate program, you are both constrained and stretched. In most of the graduate courses I took, I found that I was exposed to ideas and books that I would never have chosen on my own, and I thought about them more deeply because of the requirement to respond and discuss the ideas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Formal education is by no means dead. It may need some updating in some cases, and it needs to take other ways of learning into account, but I think there will always be a place for it in our professional development.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerald Aungst</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:47:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No Longer a Teacher</title><link>http://www.quisitivity.org/2010/02/no-longer-a-teacher/#comment-38533046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like your new definition of our profession.  Actually, I have avoided graduate school, because I find my personal learning has exploded past the offerings at a graduate level.  By the time any new idea is explored to a publishable point, it is nearly redundant.  Thank you for the clarity of thought in this blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Todd Wandio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>